Impact of resection margin on outcome in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities treated with limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The standard curative treatments for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) include surgical resection with negative margins and perioperative radiotherapy. However, the optimal resection margin remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes in ESTS between microscopically positive margin (R1) and microscopically negative margin (R0) according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (R + 1 mm) classification. METHODS: Medical records of patients with localized ESTS who underwent primary limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed for at least 5 years or till local or distant recurrence was diagnosed during follow-up. Outcomes were local and distal recurrences and survival. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in this study, in which 17 underwent R0 resection and 35 underwent R1 resection. No significant differences were observed in rates of local recurrence (11.4% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.062) or distant recurrence (40.0% vs. 41.18%, p = 0.935) between R0 and R1 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that distant recurrences was associated with a Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade (Grade III vs. I, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 12.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.67-58.88, p = 0.001) and tumor location (lower vs. upper extremity, aHR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.7, p = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier plots showed no significant differences in local (p = 0.444) or distant recurrent-free survival (p = 0.161) between R0 and R1 groups. CONCLUSIONS: R1 margins, when complemented by radiotherapy, did not significantly alter outcomes of ESTS as R0 margins. Further studies with more histopathological types and larger cohorts are necessary to highlight the path forward.

Habitat escalated adaptive therapy (HEAT): a phase 2 trial utilizing radiomic habitat-directed and genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) optimization for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), have significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, with poor response to standard neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Achieving a favorable pathologic response (FPR ≥ 95%) from RT is associated with improved patient outcome. Genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD), a radiation-specific metric that quantifies the expected RT treatment effect as a function of tumor dose and genomics, proposed that STS is significantly underdosed. STS have significant radiomic heterogeneity, where radiomic habitats can delineate regions of intra-tumoral hypoxia and radioresistance. We designed a novel clinical trial, Habitat Escalated Adaptive Therapy (HEAT), utilizing radiomic habitats to identify areas of radioresistance within the tumor and targeting them with GARD-optimized doses, to improve FPR in high-grade STS. METHODS: Phase 2 non-randomized single-arm clinical trial includes non-metastatic, resectable high-grade STS patients. Pre-treatment multiparametric MRIs (mpMRI) delineate three distinct intra-tumoral habitats based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences. GARD estimates that simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) doses of 70 and 60 Gy in 25 fractions to the highest and intermediate radioresistant habitats, while the remaining volume receives standard 50 Gy, would lead to a > 3 fold FPR increase to 24%. Pre-treatment CT guided biopsies of each habitat along with clip placement will be performed for pathologic evaluation, future genomic studies, and response assessment. An mpMRI taken between weeks two and three of treatment will be used for biological plan adaptation to account for tumor response, in addition to an mpMRI after the completion of radiotherapy in addition to pathologic response, toxicity, radiomic response, disease control, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. Furthermore, liquid biopsy will be performed with mpMRI for future ancillary studies. DISCUSSION: This is the first clinical trial to test a novel genomic-based RT dose optimization (GARD) and to utilize radiomic habitats to identify and target radioresistance regions, as a strategy to improve the outcome of RT-treated STS patients. Its success could usher in a new phase in radiation oncology, integrating genomic and radiomic insights into clinical practice and trial designs, and may reveal new radiomic and genomic biomarkers, refining personalized treatment strategies for STS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05301283. TRIAL STATUS: The trial started recruitment on March 17, 2022.

Update on Dosing and Fractionation for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) over 5-6 weeks with daily doses of 1.8-2.0 Gy to a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy is standard of care for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. One exception is myxoid liposarcomas where the phase II DOREMY trial applying a preoperative dose of 36 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (3-4 weeks treatment) has achieved excellent local control rates of 100% after a median follow-up of 25 months.Hypofractionated preoperative RT has been investigated in a number of phase II single-arm studies suggesting that daily doses of 2.75-8 Gy over 1-3 weeks can achieve similar oncological outcomes to conventional neoadjuvant RT. Prospective data with direct head-to-head comparison to conventional neoadjuvant RT investigating oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles is eagerly awaited.For the entire group of retroperitoneal sarcomas, RT is not the standard of care. The randomized multi-center STRASS trial did not find a benefit in abdominal recurrence-free survival by the addition of preoperative RT. However, for the largest histological subgroup of well-differentiated and grades I and II dedifferentiated liposarcomas, the STRASS trial and the post-hoc propensity-matched STREXIT analysis have identified a possible benefit in survival by preoperative RT. These patients deserve to be informed about the pros and cons of preoperative RT while the longer follow-up data from the STRASS trial is awaited.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for pediatric sarcomas and other solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate local failure (LF) and toxicity after intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in pediatric solid tumors (ST). METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study of 96 pediatric patients (108 applications) with ST treated from 1995 to 2022 with IORT. LF was calculated via cumulative incidence function and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier method, both from the day of surgery. RESULTS: Median age at time of IORT was 8 years (range: 0.8-20.9 years). Median follow-up for all patients and surviving patients was 16 months and 3 years, respectively. The most common histologies included rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 42), Ewing sarcoma (n = 10), and Wilms tumor (n = 9). Most (95%) received chemotherapy, 37% had prior external beam radiation therapy to the site of IORT, and 46% had a prior surgery for tumor resection. About half (54%) were treated with upfront IORT to the primary tumor due to difficult circumstances such as very young age or challenging anatomy. The median IORT dose was 12 Gy (range: 4-18 Gy), and median area treated was 24 cm2 (range: 2-198 cm2). The cumulative incidence of LF was 17% at 2 years and 23% at 5 years. Toxicity from IORT was reasonable, with postoperative complications likely related to IORT seen in 15 (16%) patients. CONCLUSION: Our study represents the largest and most recent analysis of efficacy and safety of IORT in pediatric patients with ST. Less than one quarter of all patients failed locally with acceptable toxicities. Overall, IORT is an effective and safe technique to achieve local control in patients with challenging circumstances.

The Effect of chemo- and radiotherapy on tumor necrosis in soft tissue sarcoma- does it influence prognosis?

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors. Wide surgical resection is standard, often combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both. Studies have shown the predictive value of tumor necrosis in bone sarcoma (BS); however, the role of necrosis in STS after neoadjuvant therapies is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the role of chemo- and radiotherapy in the formation of tumor necrosis and to evaluate the influence of tumor necrosis on overall survival and local recurrence-free survival. Data from BS patients and patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy were compared. METHODS: A total of 779 patients with STS or BS were treated surgically. In all patients, tumor-specific factors such as type, size, or grading and the type of adjuvant therapy were documented. Local recurrence (LR), the diagnosis of metastatic disease, and survival during follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 565 patients with STS and 214 with BS were investigated. In STS, 24.1% G1 lesions, 34.1% G2 lesions, and 41.8% G3 lesions were observed. Two hundred twenty-four of the patients with STS and neoadjuvant therapy had either radiotherapy (RTx) (n = 80), chemotherapy (CTx) (n = 93), or both (n = 51). Three hundred forty-one had no neoadjuvant therapy at all. In STS, tumor necrosis after neoadjuvant treatment was significantly higher (53.5%) than in patients without neoadjuvant therapy (15.7%) (p < 0.001). Patients with combined neoadjuvant chemo-/radiotherapy had substantially higher tumor necrosis than those with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.032). There was no difference in tumor necrosis in patients with combined chemo-/radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone (p = 0.4). The mean overall survival for patients with STS was 34.7 months. Tumor necrosis did not influence survival in a subgroup of G2/3 patients. In STS with no neoadjuvant therapy and grading of G2/3, the correlation between necrosis and overall survival was significant (p = 0.0248). There was no significant correlation between local recurrence (LR) and necrosis. CONCLUSION: STS shows a broad spectrum of necrosis even without neoadjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. After CTx or/and RTx necrosis is enhanced and is significantly pronounced with a combination of both. There is a trend toward higher necrosis with CTx than with RTx. Grading substantially influences the necrosis rate, but necrosis in soft-tissue sarcoma following neoadjuvant therapy does not correlate with better survival or a lower local recurrence rate, as in bone sarcomas.

Unraveling the Myth of Radiation Resistance in Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

There is a misconception that sarcomas are resistant to radiotherapy. This manuscript summarizes available (pre-) clinical data on the radiosensitivity of soft tissue sarcomas. Currently, clinical practice guidelines suggest irradiating sarcomas in 1.8-2 Gy once daily fractions. Careful observation of myxoid liposarcomas patients during preoperative radiotherapy led to the discovery of this subtype's remarkable radiosensitivity. It resulted subsequently in an international prospective clinical trial demonstrating the safety of a reduced total dose, yet still delivered with conventional 1.8-2 Gy fractions. In several areas of oncology, especially for tumors of epithelial origin where radiotherapy plays a curative role, the concurrent application of systemic compounds aiming for radiosensitization has been incorporated into routine clinical practice. This approach has also been investigated in sarcomas and is summarized in this manuscript. Observing relatively low α/ß ratios after preclinical cellular investigations, investigators have explored hypofractionation with daily doses ranging from 2.85-8.0 Gy per day in prospective clinical studies, and the data are presented. Finally, we summarize work with mouse models and genomic investigations to predict observed responses to radiotherapy in sarcoma patients. Taken together, these data indicate that sarcomas are not resistant to radiation therapy.

The Use of Proton and Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Sarcomas.

The unique physical and biological characteristics of proton and carbon ions allow for improved sparing of normal tissues, decreased integral dose to the body, and increased biological effect through high linear energy transfer. These properties are particularly useful for sarcomas given their histology, wide array of locations, and age of diagnosis. This review summarizes the literature and describes the clinical situations in which these heavy particles have advantages for treating sarcomas.

Progress in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Management: Surgical and Radiotherapy Approaches.

Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), aiming for complete excision, yet the complexity of RPS with its proximity to vital structures continues to lead to high local recurrence rates after surgery alone. Thus, the role of radiotherapy (RT) continues to be refined to improve local control, which remains an important goal to prevent RPS recurrence. The recently completed global randomized trial to evaluate the role of surgery with and without preoperative RT - STRASS1, did not demonstrate a significant overall benefit for neoadjuvant RT based on the pre-specified definition of abdominal recurrence-free survival, however, sensitivity analysis using a standard definition of local recurrence and analysis of outcomes by compliance to the RT protocol suggests histology-specific benefit in well- and some de-differentiated liposarcomas. Ultimately, multidisciplinary collaboration and personalized approaches that consider histological sarcoma types and patient-specific factors are imperative for optimizing the therapeutic strategy in the management of RPS.

FLASH Radiotherapy: What Can FLASH's Ultra High Dose Rate Offer to the Treatment of Patients With Sarcoma?

FLASH is an emerging treatment paradigm in radiotherapy (RT) that utilizes ultra-high dose rates (UHDR; >40 Gy)/s) of radiation delivery. Developing advances in technology support the delivery of UHDR using electron and proton systems, as well as some ion beam units (eg, carbon ions), while methods to achieve UHDR with photons are under investigation. The major advantage of FLASH RT is its ability to increase the therapeutic index for RT by shifting the dose response curve for normal tissue toxicity to higher doses. Numerous preclinical studies have been conducted to date on FLASH RT for murine sarcomas, alongside the investigation of its effects on relevant normal tissues of skin, muscle, and bone. The tumor control achieved by FLASH RT of sarcoma models is indistinguishable from that attained by treatment with standard RT to the same total dose. FLASH's high dose rates are able to mitigate the severity or incidence of RT side effects on normal tissues as evaluated by endpoints ranging from functional sparing to histological damage. Large animal studies and clinical trials of canine patients show evidence of skin sparing by FLASH vs. standard RT, but also caution against delivery of high single doses with FLASH that exceed those safely applied with standard RT. Also, a human clinical trial has shown that FLASH RT can be delivered safely to bone metastasis. Thus, data to date support continued investigations of clinical translation of FLASH RT for the treatment of patients with sarcoma. Toward this purpose, hypofractionated irradiation schemes are being investigated for FLASH effects on sarcoma and relevant normal tissues.

Are We Ready for Life in the Fast Lane? A Critical Review of Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

This critical review aims to summarize the relevant published data regarding hypofractionation regimens for preoperative radiation therapy (RT) prior to surgery for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity or superficial trunk. We identified peer-reviewed publications using a PubMed search on the MeSH headings of "soft tissue sarcoma" AND "hypofractionated radiation therapy." To obtain complication data on similar anatomical radiotherapeutic scenarios we also searched "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "melanoma" as well as "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "breast cancer." We then used reference lists from relevant articles to obtain additional pertinent publications. We also incorporated relevant abstracts presented at international sarcoma meetings and relevant clinical trials as listed on the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Detailed data are presented and contextualized for ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated regimens with respect to local control, wound complications, and amputation rates. Comparative data are also presented for late toxicities including: fibrosis, joint limitation, edema, skin integrity, and bone fracture or necrosis. These data are compared to a standard regimen of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions delivered over 5 weeks. This analysis supports the continued use of a standard regimen for preoperative RT for STS of 25 × 2 Gy over 5 weeks without concurrent chemotherapy. Use of concurrent chemotherapy with preoperative RT for STS should be reserved for well-designed clinical trials. A randomized trial of ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated pre op RT for STS is warranted, but it is critical for the primary endpoint (or co-primary endpoint) to be late toxicity to: bone, soft tissue, joint, and skin.

Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy Combinations for Sarcoma.

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of bone and soft tissue tumors. Survival outcomes for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) disease remain poor, so therapeutic improvements are needed. Radiotherapy plays an integral role in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of localized disease as well as in the treatment of metastatic disease. Combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy to potentiate immunotherapy has been used in a variety of cancers other than sarcoma, and there is opportunity to further investigate combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy to try to improve outcomes in sarcoma. In this review, we describe the diversity of the tumor immune microenvironments for sarcomas and describe the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy. We discuss studies on the timing of radiotherapy relative to immunotherapy and studies on the radiotherapy dose and fractionation regimen to be used in combination with immunotherapy. We describe the impact of radiotherapy on the tumor immune microenvironment. We review completed and ongoing clinical trials combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy for sarcoma and propose future directions for studies combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy in the treatment of sarcoma.

Radiotherapy Combined with Intralesional Immunostimulatory Agents for Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Immunotherapy has shifted the treatment paradigm for many types of cancer. Unfortunately, the most commonly used immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), have yielded limited benefit for most types of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Radiotherapy (RT) is a mainstay of sarcoma therapy and can induce immune modulatory effects. Combining immunotherapy and RT in STS may be a promising strategy to improve sarcoma response to RT and increase the efficacy of immunotherapy. Most combination strategies have employed immunotherapies, such as ICI, that derepress immune suppressive networks. These have yielded only modest results, possibly due to the limited immune stimulatory effects of RT. Combining RT with immune stimulatory agents has yielded promising preclinical and clinical results but can be limited by the toxic nature of systemic administration of immune stimulants. Using intralesional immune stimulants may generate stronger RT immune modulation and less systemic toxicity, which may be a feasible strategy in accessible tumors such as STS. In this review, we summarize the immune modulatory effects of RT, the mechanism of action of various immune stimulants, including toll-like receptor agonists, and data for combinatorial strategies utilizing these agents.

Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America.

BACKGROUND: The addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test. RESULTS: Of 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.

A Pilot Study of Pembrolizumab Combined With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Sarcoma.

OBJECTIVES: Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown only limited success in the management of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Overall response rates (ORR) with single agent pembrolizumab were 18% and median PFS was 18 weeks on the clinical trial SARC028. One strategy to improve the responses to immunotherapy is with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which can enhance the antitumor CD8 T cell response through the release of tumor-specific antigens, potentially priming a more diverse class of T cell receptors. METHODS: This is a phase 0, pilot prospective study taking place at a single center with 2 arms. In Arm A, patients are treated with pembrolizumab 400 mg IV infusion on day 1 of a 42-day cycle. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is delivered in 1-5 fractions starting on C1D15-28 and given every other day. In Arm B, patients who have started an immune checkpoint inhibitor within 60 days are treated with SBRT in addition to the current therapy. RESULTS: In this study we outline testing the feasibility of adding SBRT to pembrolizumab. CONCLUSION: The ultimate goal of combination therapy is improved overall response, including tumors not treated with SBRT. This trial can be found registered online: NCT05488366.

The role of 18F-FDG PET in minimizing variability in gross tumor volume delineation of soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Accurate gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation is a critical step in radiation therapy treatment planning. However, it is reader dependent and thus susceptible to intra- and inter-reader variability. GTV delineation of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often relies on CT and MR images. PURPOSE: This study investigates the potential role of 18F-FDG PET in reducing intra- and inter-reader variability thereby improving reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS, without incurring additional costs or radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three readers performed independent GTV delineation of 61 patients with STS using first CT and MR followed by CT, MR, and 18F-FDG PET images. Each reader performed a total of six delineation trials, three trials per imaging modality group. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to assess both intra- and inter-reader variability using generated simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) GTVs as ground truth. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed-ranked test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in both intra- and inter-reader variability in GTV delineation using CT, MR 18F-FDG PET images vs. CT and MR images. This was translated by an increase in the DSC score and a decrease in the HD for GTVs drawn from CT, MR and 18F-FDG PET images vs. GTVs drawn from CT and MR for all readers and across all three trials. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of 18F-FDG PET into CT and MR images decreased intra- and inter-reader variability and subsequently increased reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS.

Partially Ablative Body Radiotherapy (PABR): A novel approach for palliative radiotherapy of locally advanced bulky unresectable sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced, bulky, unresectable sarcomas cause significant tumour mass effects, leading to burdensome symptoms. We have developed a novel Partially Ablative Body Radiotherapy (PABR) technique that delivers a high, ablative dose to the tumour core and a low, palliative dose to its periphery aiming to increase overall tumour response without significantly increasing treatment toxicity. AIM: This study aims to report the safety and oncologic outcomes of PABR in patients with bulky, unresectable sarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 18 patients with histologically proven sarcoma treated with PABR from January 2020 to October 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoints were symptomatic and structural response rates. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, freedom from local progression, freedom from distant progression, and acute and late toxicity rates. RESULTS: All patients had tumours ≥5 cm with a median tumour volume of 985 cc, and the most common symptom was pain. The median age is 72.5 years and 44.5 % were ECOG 2-3. The most common regimen used was 20 Gy in 5 fractions with an intratumoral boost dose of 50 Gy (83.3 %). After a median follow-up of 11 months, 88.9 % of patients exhibited a partial response with a mean absolute tumour volume reduction of 49.5 %. All symptomatic patients experienced symptom improvement. One-year OS, FFLP and FFDP were 61 %, 83.3 % and 34.8 %, respectively. There were no grade 3 or higher toxicities. CONCLUSION: PABR for bulky, unresectable sarcomas appears to be safe and may provide good symptomatic response, tumour debulking, and local control. Further study is underway.

Definitive single fraction spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic sarcoma: Simultaneous integrated boost is associated with high tumor control and low vertebral fracture risk.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoma spinal metastases (SSM) are particularly difficult to manage given their poor response rates to chemotherapy and inherent radioresistance. We evaluated outcomes in a cohort of patients with SSM uniformly treated using single-fraction simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at a single tertiary institution treated with SSRS for SSM between April 2007-April 2023. 16-24 Gy was delivered to the GTV and 16 Gy uniformly to the CTV. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to assess time to progression of disease (PD) with proportionate hazards modelling used to determine hazard ratios (HR) and respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: 70 patients with 100 lesions underwent SSRS for SSM. Median follow-up was 19.3 months (IQR 7.7-27.8). Median age was 55 years (IQR42-63). Median GTV and CTVs were 14.5 cm3 (IQR 5-32) and 52.7 cm3 (IQR 29.5-87.5) respectively. Median GTV prescription dose and biologically equivalent dose (BED) [α/ß = 10] was 24 Gy and 81.6 Gy respectively. 85 lesions received 24 Gy to the GTV. 27 % of patients had Bilsky 1b or greater disease. 16 of 100 lesions recurred representing a crude local failure rate of 16 % with a median time to failure of 10.4 months (IQR 5.7-18) in cases which failed locally. 1-year actuarial local control (LC) was 89 %. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.3 months (IQR 7.7-25) from SSRS. Every 1 Gy increase in GTV absolute minimum dose (DMin) across the range (5.8-25 Gy) was associated with a reduced risk of local failure (HR = 0.871 [95 % CI 0.782-0.97], p = 0.009). 9 % of patients developed vertebral compression fractures at a median of 13 months post SSRS (IQR 7-25). CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the most homogenously treated and the largest cohorts of patients with SSM treated with single-fraction SSRS. Despite inherent radioresistance, SSRS confers durable and high rates of local control in SSM without unexpected long-term toxicity rates.

Deformable image registration for composite planned doses during adaptive radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients have significant anatomic changes during radiotherapy, necessitating an adaptive repeat CT-simulation and re-planning. This yields two unique planning datasets that introduce uncertainty into total dose records. This study explored the impact of using deformable image registration (DIR) to spatially align repeat CT-simulation images and calculate total planned dose distributions. MATERIALS & METHODS: Data from 5 head-and-neck, 5 lung, and 5 sarcoma patients who had unanticipated re-planning during radiotherapy were analyzed in a treatment planning system (RayStation v6.1 RaySearch Laboratories). Total planned doses to normal tissues were calculated using two methods and the previously generated manual contours defined on each CT. The first method, termed 'parameter addition', simply sums the relevant DVH metrics from the initial and re-planned distributions without spatially registering the CTs. The second, termed 'dose accumulation', uses a validated hybrid contour/intensity-based DIR algorithm to deform initial CT and dose distribution onto the repeat CT and re-planning dose distribution. DVH metrics from the summed distribution on the repeat CT are then calculated. Dose differences for organs-at-risk between parameter addition and dose accumulation ≥100 cGy were assumed to be clinically relevant. To elucidate whether relevant differences were due to registration accuracy or contouring variability between CTs, the analysis was repeated using contours on the first CT and the same contours deformed to the repeat CT with DIR. RESULTS: For all patients, high overall DIR accuracy was verified visually (qualitatively) and numerically (quantitatively) using image similarity and contour-based metrics. All head-and-neck and lung patients, and one sarcoma patient (11 of 15 total) had dose differences between parameter addition and dose accumulation ≥100 cGy, with absolute mean differences of 160 cGy (range 101-436 cGy) seen in 41 of 205 total DVH criteria. In 22 of these 41 criteria, these differences were attributed to contouring variability between CTs. After correcting for contouring variations using DIR, the mean absolute differences in 7 of these 22 criteria with a relevant result (across 6 patients) was 146 cGy (range 100-502 cGy). In only 4 DVH criteria, the DIR mapped contours had higher variations than the original contours. One lung patient had a DVH criteria exceeding the clinical dose constraint by 125 cGy with parameter addition, and with accurate DIR and dose accumulation, the criteria was actually 97 cGy lower than the constraint. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DIR to generate total planned dose records revealed substantial dose differences in most cases compared to commonly used clinical methods (i.e. parameter addition), and altered the planned acceptance criteria in a minority. DIR is recommended to be used for future adaptive re-plans to generate total planned dose records and facilitate accurate re-contouring. More accurate dose records may also improve our understanding of clinical outcomes.

Management of oligometastatic/metastatic sarcomas and place of local treatments with focus on modern radiotherapy approaches.

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous disease. For localized disease, treatment is based on surgery and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy depending on risk factors. Upfront metastases are present in 7 to 20% of cases, and are localized to the lungs in most of cases. Disseminated disease is generally considered incurable but in selected cases, aggressive local treatment of metastases allowed long survival. Treatment of primary tumour is often debated. Our purpose is to evaluate the literature concerning the role of radiotherapy in the management of primary metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.